Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 12;41(2):BSR20200490. doi: 10.1042/BSR20200490

Table 2. Subgroup analyses of studies included in a meta-analysis of GSTM1 null genotype and CHD risk.

Null versus present Studies Cases/controls OR (95% CI) Heterogeneity Model P for Begg's test P for Egger's test
I2 PH
Total studies 37 16684/36510 1.38 (1.15, 1.69) 93.8% <0.001 Random 0.097 0.499
Total studies (adjustment for heterogeneity1) 22 5341/8322 1.17 (1.05, 1.31) 40.2% 0.027 Random 0.236 0.424
Smoker 14 2249/1300 1.64 (1.12, 2.40) 82.2% <0.001 Random 0.189 0.387
Non-smoker 11 1962/2195 1.26 (0.70, 2.27) 94.2% <0.001 Random 0.755 0.043
Ethnicity
 Caucasians 23 12268/31531 1.34 (1.04, 1.72) 95.7% <0.001 Random 0.045 0.605
 Caucasians (adjustment for heterogeneity2) 13 2980/4021 1.18 (1.07, 1.31) 18.1% 0.261 Fixed 1.00 0.763
 Asians 13 3547/3406 1.40 (1.11, 1.77) 78.6% <0.001 Random 0.583 0.903
 Asians (adjustment for heterogeneity3) 9 2001/2094 1.60 (1.32, 1.95) 44.2% 0.073 Random 0.348 0.557
Source of controls
 HB 12 4302/3023 1.47 (0.86, 2.51) 96.10% <0.001 Random 0.244 0.238
 PB 25 12382/33487 1.33 (1.11, 1.58) 91.20% <0.001 Random 0.199 0.418
Sample size
 <600 20 3628/2973 1.32 (1.09, 1.61) 68.5% <0.001 Random 0.041 0.016
 >600 17 13056/33537 1.40 (1.07, 1.84) 96.9% <0.001 Random 0.650 0.472

Abbreviations: HB, hospital based; PB, population based.

PH: P-value based on Q test for between-study heterogeneity.

1

Adjustment for heterogeneity was performed by excluding 15 studies as the outliers and the possible major source of heterogeneity.

2

Adjustment for heterogeneity was performed by excluding 10 studies as the outliers and the possible major source of heterogeneity.

3

Adjustment for heterogeneity was performed by excluding 4 studies as the outliers and the possible major source of heterogeneity.