Table 2.
Comparison of patients’ baseline characteristics in robotic vs. open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
| Included studies | Age (years) | Gender (% male) | BMI (kg/m2) | ASA > 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic | Open | Robotic | Open | Robotic | Open | Robotic | Open | |
| Baker 201636 | 63 (38–82)* | 63 (26–86)* | 5% | 63% | 26 (18–35)* | 27 (16–38)* | 68% | 82% |
| Bao 201437 | 68 ± 11.2 | 67.7 ± 12.5 | 46% | 46% | 26 (19–40)* | 26 (19–40)* | NR | NR |
| Bencini 202038 | 60 (42–73)* | 74 (56–91)* | 58% | 53% | 26 (18–32)* | 24 (14–38)* | 16% | 36% |
| Boggi 201628 | 62 (50–71)* | 64 (56–74)* | 45% | 53% | 24 (23–24)* | 23 (22–25)* | 33% | 36% |
| Boone 201434 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Buchs 201139 | 63 ± 14.5 | 56 ± 15.8 | 50% | 36% | 27.7 ± 5.4 | 24.8 ± 4.7 | NR | NR |
| Butt 201640 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Cai 201935 | 66.5 ± 11.0 | 67.5 ± 10.7 | 55% | 52% | 27.8 ± 5.8 | 27.2 ± 5.9 | NR | NR |
| Chalikonda 201230 | 62 | 61 | 54% | 54% | 24.8 | 25.6 | 53% | 76% |
| Chen 201541 | 53.6 ± 13.5 | 53.8 ± 14.3 | 57% | 54% | 23.2 ± 2.7 | 22.6 ± 3.4 | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Girgis 201942 | 66.6 ± 10.9 | 67.6 ± 10.3 | 53% | 53% | 27.1 ± 5.6 | 26.4 ± 5.3 | NR | NR |
| Hammill 201043 | 55 | 62.5 | NR | NR | 26.1 | 26.6 | NR | NR |
| Ielpo 201944 | 66.8 ± 9.5 | 61.4 ± 11.9 | 47% | 59% | 23.8 ± 4.1 | 24.6 ± 3.36 | 35% | 24% |
| Kauffmann 201945 | 65 (59–75)* | 73 (60–79)* | 50% | 54% | 23.1 ± 3.2 | 24.1 ± 3.1 | NR | NR |
| Kim 201846 | 60.7 ± 11.9 | 65.4 ± 10.1 | 58% | 47% | 22.7 ± 2.5 | 24.0 ± 3.1 | 2% | 5% |
| Klompmaker 202047 | NR | 34.6 ± 11.7 | NR | 50% | NR | 24.8 ± 4.0 | NR | 20% |
| Lai 201248 | 66.4 ± 11.9 | 62.1 ± 11.2 | 60% | 57% | NR | NR | 0% | 0% |
| Marino 201949 | 60.4 (43–72)* | 62.3 (45–73)* | 54% | 43% | 23.8 (19.4–30.9)* | 23.5 (18.8–28.1)* | 20% | 23% |
| McMillan 2017 31 § | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Mejia 201550 | 67.3 ± 8 | 62 ± 10 | 71% | 58% | 27 ± 5 | 27.2 ± 5 | NR | NR |
| Napoli 2018 27 § | 62 (52–71)* | 67 (60–75)* | 44% | 55% | 23.5 ± 0.4 | 24.8 ± 0.2 | 42% | 66% |
| Shi 202051 | 59.4 ± 12.6 | 62.7 ± 10.5 | 56% | 60% | NR | NR | 4% | 6% |
| Varley 2019 32 § | 66.3 ± 10.6 | 67.0 ± 10.5 | 48% | 53% | 27.5 ± 6.1 | 26.7 ± 5.6 | 89% | 86% |
| Walsh 2011 29 § | 63 | 62 | NR | NR | 24 | 26 | 50% | 69% |
| Wang 201852 | NR | NR | 50% | 57% | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Wilson 2019 33 § | 67.3 ± 10.3 | 69.8 ± 10.2 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Zhou 201153 | 64.4 ± 9.1 | 59.4 ± 9.4 | 63% | 50% | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Zimmerman 201854 | 66 (68–72)* | 65 (57–72)* | 52% | 54% | 27.3 (23.8–30.9)* | 26.5 (23.2–30.2)* | NR | NR |
| Zureikat 20168 | 67 (15–86)* | 65 (15–93)* | 55% | 52% | 27.5 (18.1–47.6)* | 26.1 (14.7–85.5)* | NR | NR |
BMI body mass index; ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists; NR not reported.
*Expressed in median and interquartile range.
§Studies that were excluded from the quantitative synthesis.