Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 13;41(4):1687–1703. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01470-8

Table 3.

Results of competing models of simple mediation, moderated mediation and dual moderated mediation

Dependent variable:
M: Attitude Y: Behaviour
Model 1 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Step 1: Control Variables
  Age

.01

(.01)

.01

(.01)

−.00

(.19)

−.00

(.00)

−.00

(.00)

Step 2: Mediator
  M: Attitude

.69**

(.04)

.68**

(.05)

.33**

(.11)

Step 3: Independent variable
  X: Awareness

−.29**

(.05)

−.27**

(.05)

−.07

(.04)

−.07

(.04)

−.06

(.04)

Step 4: Moderator
  W: Gender

−.10

(.28)

−1.53**

(.58)

  Z: Technology use (Hours)

−.12**

(.03)

Step 5: Moderating Effect
  M×W

.03

(.08)

.43**

(.16)

  M×Z

.03**

(.01)

  W×Z

.13**

(.05)

  M×W×Z

−.04**

(.01)

Constant

2.55**

(.19)

2.68**

(.19)

.91**

(.19)

.94**

(.20)

2.24**

(.40)

R2 .08 .06 .49 .50 .52
F Statistic

15.94**

(df = 2; 379)

13.14**

(df = 2; 379)

123.94**

(df = 3; 378)

74.05**

(df = 5; 376)

43.92**

(df = 9; 372)

p* < .05, p** < .01