Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 13;2(2):94. doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00484-0

Table 3.

Performance evaluation on the proposed method compared to eight other methods

Methods Year Accuracy %
Lohit et al. [21] 2018 57.90
Patel et al. [30] 2018 89.43
R-NKTM [32] 2018 90.00
DB-LSTM [50] 2018 91.22
SVM-KNN [38] 2017 91.47
MRST-T [57] 2019 92.20
ConvLSTM(Softmax) 2020 92.60
C2LSTM [25] 2020 92.80
ECO [64] 2019 93.10
HFR-DL (Proposed method) 2020 93.90