Table 4.
Evaluation of the proposed method based on different jumps
| Methods | Frame jump | Average time (S) | Average Acc. % |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB-LSTM [50] | 4.0 | 1.72 | 92.2% |
| 6.0 | 1.12 | 91.5% | |
| 8.0 | 0.9 | 85.34% | |
| HFR-DL (Proposed method) | 4.0 | 2.10 | 95.62% |
| 6.0 | 1.6 | 93.9% | |
| 8.0 | 1.10 | 89.6% |
Evaluation of the proposed method based on different jumps
| Methods | Frame jump | Average time (S) | Average Acc. % |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB-LSTM [50] | 4.0 | 1.72 | 92.2% |
| 6.0 | 1.12 | 91.5% | |
| 8.0 | 0.9 | 85.34% | |
| HFR-DL (Proposed method) | 4.0 | 2.10 | 95.62% |
| 6.0 | 1.6 | 93.9% | |
| 8.0 | 1.10 | 89.6% |