| Study type |
Systematic reviews, defined as reviews that include all of these items: a research question, search strategy, the sources searched, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening methods, assessment of included studies’ quality, and information about data synthesis |
Reviews that did not meet the working definition of a systematic review; systematic reviews that included case series or expert opinion pieces |
| Population |
Systematic reviews with participants with vision impairment or eye disease |
Systematic reviews with participants with stroke-associated vision impairment, since these vision impairments and consequences (eg, visual neglect, visual hallucinations) are different from eye pathologies |
| Interventions |
For systematic reviews of interventional studies, systematic reviews that assessed interventions that aim to improve or preserve vision, prevent or stop the progression of vision impairment, or improve vision function |
For systematic reviews of interventional studies, systematic reviews that assessed psychologic interventions, such as coping strategies |
| Outcomes |
Systematic reviews that reported on quality-of-life outcomes, such as health-related, vision-related, or disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaires, or qualitative assessments of physical, emotional, and social well-being and vision function in day-to-day life |
Systematic reviews that reported on patient satisfaction and patient-reported symptoms |
| Other |
None |
Conference abstracts and articles not in English; systematic reviews that had an updated version available (they were used as an additional reference only if the updated review referred to them) |
