Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 12;13:10. doi: 10.1186/s13321-021-00490-7

Table 1.

Comparing RegioSQM implementations

Methodology Corr/Semi/Fail Median CPU time (s)a Mean CPU time (s)a Total CPU time (h)a,b
RegioSQM18 488/30/17 42 127 10
GFN1-xTB/methanol 486/27/22 60 230 17
FF Optimization 485/29/21 33 110 8
Tautomers (canonical RDKit) 477/28/30 33 110 8
Tautomers (lowest energy) 483/27/25 39 163 12
Tautomers (15 kcal/mol) 496/21/18 49 223 17

The last entry corresponds to RegioSQM20. For the generation of the conformers, a random seed of 90 was used. Furthermore, the RegioSQM18 and GFN1-xTB/methanol entries uses ETversion=1 and otherwise ETversion=2. Corr/Semi/Fail is defined in Fig. 4

a4 cores/molecule (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5550 @ 2.67GHz). bTwo molecules running in parallel