Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 10;9:e10821. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10821

Table 4. Differences in body posture parameters between the groups of children examined.

Parameters Examination Group I–II Group I–III Group II–III
p p p
ALFA [°] I 0.382 0.353 0.838
II 0.895 0.824 0.648
BETA [°] I 0.389 0.563 0.313
II 0.619 0.871 0.663
GAMMA [°] I 0.688 0.847 0.615
II 0.650 0.737 0.872
KKP [°] I 0.708 0.915 0.921
II 0.721 0.698 0.991
KLL [°] I 0.258 0.940 0.553
II 0.285 0.317 0.924
MI I 0.418 0.952 0.578
II 0.801 0.727 0.917
KPT [°] I 0.720 0.399 0.253
II 0.655 0.517 0.154
KNT [°] I 0.810 0.403 0.491
II 0.546 0.727 0.778
UK [°] I 0.213 0.04 0.308
II 0.117 0.258 0.611
KNM [mm] I 0.444 0.752 0.707
II 0.894 0.440 0.280
KLB [°] I 0.690 0.839 0.443
II 0.623 0.953 0.572
TT [mm] I 0.863 0.780 0.566
II 0.644 0.722 0.902
UL [mm] I 0.968 0.659 0.892
II 0.314 0.04 0.796
POTSI I 0.795 0.432 0.607
II 0.09 0.320 0.609

Notes.

ALFA
lumbosacral spine region inclination [°]
BETA
thoracolumbar spine region inclination [°]
GAMMA
upper thoracic spine region inclination [°]
KKP
kyphosis angle
KKP
180 − (BETA + GAMMA) [°]
KLL
lordosis angle
KLL
180 − (ALFA + BETA) [°]
MI
compensation index
KPT
the angle of the body bent to the forward/backward [°]
KNT
the angle of the body bent to the side [°]
UK
the maximum deviation of the line of the spinous processes from the C1–S1 line on the x-axis [mm]
KNM
pelvic inclination angle [mm]
KLB
angle of the shoulder line [mm]
TT
angle of waist triangle [mm]
UL
angle of scapulae line [mm]
POTSI
posterior trunk symmetry index

ANOVA analysis: statistically significant results between groups (p < 0.05).