Table III.
Comparison of Rh phenotype frequencies with different ethnic groups and parts of India
| Phenotype | North | South | East | West | Caucasians (Reid and Lomas-Francis 2004)14 | Africans (Reid and Lomas-Francis 2004)14 | Chinese (Lin-Chu et al, 1998)15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thakral et al, 20109 (Chandigarh) (n=1240) | Makroo et al, 201310(New Delhi) (n=3015) | Gundrajukuppam et al, 201611 (Tirupati) (n=1000) | Nag and Das 201212 (West Bengal) (n=3850) | Kahar and Patel 201413 (South Gujarat) (n=115) | Present study (Mumbai) (n=500) | |||||
| Weiner | Fisher-race | Percentage proportion | ||||||||
| R1R1 | CDe/CDe | 43.8 | 42.6 | 43.4 | 49.4 | 40.87 | 44.0 | 18.5 | 2.0 | 47.5 |
| R1r | CDe/cde | 30.0 | 32.2 | 31.2 | 27.0 | 23.48 | 30.2 | 34.9 | 21.0 | 8.1 |
| R2r | cDE/cde | 8.95 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 6.8 | 11.8 | 18.6 | 2.0 |
| R1R2 | CDe/cDE | 8.22 | 14.5 | 10.7 | 11.0 | 13.91 | 10.2 | 13.3 | 4.0 | 34.4 |
| R2R2 | cDE/cDE | 1.45 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.0 | - | 0.6 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 5.9 |
| R0r | cDe/cde | 0.97 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 0.87 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 45.8 | 0.3 |
| rr | cde/cde | 5.81 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 11.30 | 5.6 | 15.1 | 6.8 | 0.2 |
| r’r | Cde/cde | 0.56 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | - | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.4 |