Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 13.
Published in final edited form as: Electron J Sci Educ. 2015 Dec 8;19(8):15129.

Appendix A.

Overview of a Typical Master Teacher Summer Institute

Institute Component Description Purpose Institute Day Time allotted
Pre-course readings Articles on the institute topic(s), sometimes authored by the scientist presenters Familiarize teachers with the topic(s) before the institute begins Any time before institute begins Open
Working Styles protocol (NSRF)* Exercise for identifying teachers’ working styles Facilitate teachers’ identification of their own and others’ working styles and build a value for working style diversity; informs staff about teachers’ working styles

Prepare for productive collaboration during later design process
Day 1 20 minutes
Interactive scientist presentations about current research Scientists from the University of Utah and other institutions present their research related to the institute topic(s)

3–5 presentations/institute
For teachers to gain and clarify new knowledge and understandings about cutting-edge science (and research processes)

Begin the process of making meaning of the new content, both individually and collaboratively
Days 1–2 1.5 hours or more/presentation, including embedded Q&A
Teachers distill key concepts from each presentation After each presentation, teachers work collaboratively in small groups to distill the information into key concepts
* 1 key concept is written on each sticky note
* Sticky notes are grouped by key concepts (whole-group exercise)
Part of the sense-making process for the new content, both individually and collaboratively Days 1–2 30 minutes/presentation
Hands-on activities, laboratory investigations and/or field experiences Scientists and/or Center staff who are scientists engage teachers in activities related to the institute topic that could be translated into the classroom Engage teachers in inquiry-based experiences related to the institute topic(s); model experiences they could use in their classrooms Days 1–2; can extend into days 3–4 for multi-day laboratory investigations 30 minutes – 1 day
Main ideas about readings protocol Facilitators and teachers collaboratively distill key concepts from the readings using a text-based discussion protocol, chosen from NSRF* protocols; e.g., “Text-Rendering”; concepts are recorded on sticky notes Further processing and making meaning of the new content, both individually and collectively Day 2, end of day 30 minutes
Create preliminary key concept categories (topics for curriculum design) Facilitators group key concepts on teachers’ sticky notes from presentations and readings into broad categories/topics

Further organizing key concepts from lectures and readings
Contributes to ensuring productive collaboration by teachers the following day. Day 2, after teachers have left for the day 30–60 minutes
Discussion of key concept categories/topics Teachers consider the facilitators’ categories and suggest changes (whole group collaborative exercise) Teachers and facilitators work collaboratively to define the topics for the next phase--curriculum design work Day 3, at beginning 20–30 minutes
Curriculum design guidelines and process Facilitators present guidelines and process for teachers’ curriculum design work

Teachers are introduced to:
* what constitutes a learning goal
* prioritizing key concepts for curriculum design
* curriculum design guidelines and process
* wiki training
Foster productive teacher collaboration during the design process and maximize quality of curriculum design Day 3 1 hour
Choosing topics for curriculum design work Teachers self-select a topic and/or group for curriculum design work by standing next to the topic on which they want to work.

Teachers are reminded about working styles
Foster productive teacher collaboration during the design process through topic self-selection and awareness of working styles Day 3 5–10 minutes
Developing student learning goals Begin process of curriculum design by distilling big ideas from the key concepts and developing student learning goals
Teachers work in their curriculum design groups to distill big ideas from the key concept sticky notes for their category

Teachers write student learning goals for each big idea

Teachers post their big ideas and learning goals on a large white board
Promote quality design through direct application of new information to student learning goals Day 3 45–60 minutes
Silent conversation (NSRF* “Chalk Talk” protocol) Silent discussion of big ideas and learning goals via comments written on white board

Individual teachers provide feedback to one another on their learning goals; also identify overlapping or identical learning goals
Maximize the quality of curriculum design by developing clear learning goals for each topic area Day 3 15–20 minutes
Refining learning goals Curriculum design groups use feedback from the silent conversation to refine their learning goals; Center staff facilitate discussions between groups about how to address any overlapping learning goals Maximize the quality of curriculum design by refining clear learning goals for each topic area Day 3 30 minutes
Curriculum design Curriculum design groups draft initial ideas for activities that can facilitate students achieving the learning goals

Teachers are asked to design ideas for computer-based, paper-based, and kinesthetic activities

Each group records their ideas on the course wiki
Design quality curriculum through productive collaboration Day 3 ½ day
Curriculum design groups report to whole group Each group briefly describes the ideas they are drafting Identify any overlap in design ideas between groups Day 3 (end) or Day 4 (beginning) 30 minutes
Commenting on wiki Teachers comment on other groups’ ideas on the wiki Idea development through collaboration with other groups Any time during days 3–5 Variable
Curriculum design Teachers continue to design curricula Further idea development and refinement Day 4 All day
Curriculum design groups report to whole group Each group shares their ideas in detail with the entire group

Process is videotaped
Teachers: Learn about activity ideas other groups have drafted.
Center: Clarify teachers’ thinking for each idea to inform curriculum development and production
Day 5 ½ day
*

NSRF = National School Reform Faculty