Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 5;2021:6678184. doi: 10.1155/2021/6678184

Table 3.

PEDro scale of methodological quality assessment for the studies.

First author Eligibility criteria Random allocation Concealed allocation Similar at baseline Subjects blinded Therapists blinded Assessors blinded <15% dropouts Intention-to-treat analysis Between-group comparisons Point measures and variability data Total
De Groef [14] 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9
Listing [15] 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 6
Rangon [24] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 7
Wyatt [13] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 7
Tsay [26] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 7
Beurskens [25] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 7
Wilkie [27] 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 6
Collinge [29] 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Wilkinson [28] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 7
Pyszora [30] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 7
Arienti [31] 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 6
Qian [32] 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 6
Chen [33] 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 6

PEDro: physiotherapy evidence database. Criteria (2–11) were used to calculate the total PEDro score. Each criterion was scored as either 1 or 0 according to whether the criteria was met or not, respectively.