Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;71(2):407–417. doi: 10.1007/s12020-020-02411-4

Table 3.

Analysis of the present data in comparison with that of the literature

Reference 1st author, yr, [ref. number] Cytology (n in each subcategory) Operated nodules, n Malignant nodules, n (%) PTC, n (%) BRAF positive PTC, n (%) Test performance, %
Se. Sp. PPV NPV
Nikiforov 2009 [19] FLUS (21), FN (23), SM (7) 51 20 (39%) 16 (31%) 7 (14%) 75 100 100 86
Cantara 2010 [18] Indeterminate (41), SM (54) 95 53 (56%) 53 (56%) 23 (24%) 81 98 98 80
Nikiforov 2011 [6] AUS/FLUS (247), FN/SFN (214), SM (52) 513 121 (24%) 110 (21%) 17 (3%) 61 98 89 89
Beaudenon-Huibregtse 2014 [17] AUS/FLUS (22), FN/SFN (19), SM (12) 53 25 (47%) na na 44 89 79 64
Eszlinger 2014 [16] Indeterminate 141 22 (16%) 2 (1%) 0 (0%) 18 86 19 85
Eszlinger 2015 [15] Thy 3 (163), Thy 4 (39) 202 83 (41%) 57 (28%) 37 (18%) 60 92 92 77
Labourier 2015 [14] III (58) IV (51) 109 35 (32%) na na 69 86 71 85
Bongiovanni 2015 [20] FN/SFN (23) 23 4 (17%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%) 75 95 95 75
Mancini 2012 [21] Thy 3 (38), Thy 4 (9) 47 17 (36%) na na 59 90 77 79
Bellevicine 2020 [22] AUS/FLUS (86), FN/SFN (34), SM (57) 177 93 (53%) 82 (46%) 39 (48%) 63 67 68 62
Present study III (37), IV (84), V (10) 131 21 (16%) 9 (7%) 4 (3%) 48 95 67 91

III, IV, V: for Bethesda class III, IV or V

Thy 3, equivalent to FN/SFN; Thy 4, equivalent to SM

AUS/FLUS atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance, FN/SFN follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN) or Hürthle cell neoplasm, SM suspicious for malignancy