Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan;10(1):242–251. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-589

Table 3. The association between ETE and clinicopathological characteristics or gene mutations in PTC.

Characteristics Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR (95% CI) for ETE P value OR (95% CI) for ETE P value
Sex (female vs. male) 0.595 (0.182–1.943) 0.390 NA NA
Age (≥55 vs. <55 years) 0.380 (0.040–3.601) 0.399 NA NA
Tumor size (>1 vs. ≤1 cm) 5.833 (1.904–17.808) 0.002 8.831 (1.971–35.578) 0.004
HT (yes vs. no) 0.116 (0.035–0.389) <0.001 0.112 (0.025–0.499) 0.004
Multifocality (yes vs. no) 1.429 (0.388–5.258) 0.592 NA NA
LNMN (≥5 vs. <5) 0.888 (0.331–2.382) 0.813 NA NA
RET mutation (yes vs. no) 0.423 (0.870–2.065) 0.288 NA NA
BRAF mutations only* 4.313 (1.097–16.955) 0.036 10.567 (1.748–63.873) 0.010
Two gene mutations* 8.250 (1.453–46.859) 0.017 8.654 (1.453–68.603) 0.041
Three gene mutations* 4.500 (0.570–35.519) 0.154 10.925 (0.740–161.185) 0.082

*Comparisons were performed between BRAF mutation groups (BRAF mutations only, BRAF + one gene mutations and BRAF + two gene mutations) and non-BRAF mutation group. ETE, extrathyroidal extension; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; HT, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis; LNMN, the Metastatic number of lymph nodes.