Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan;10(1):186–200. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-576

Table 1. Comparison between RSPDP and RDPS.

Variable RSPDP (n=52) RDPS (n=9) P value
Age (years), n (%) 0.477
   <50 31 (59.6) 4 (44.4)
   ≥50 21 (40.4) 5 (55.6)
Sex, n (%) 0.136
   Female 34 (65.4) 3 (33.3)
   Male 18 (34.6) 6 (66.7)
BMI (kg/m2), n (%) 0.686
   <24 39 (75.0) 6 (66.7)
   ≥24 13 (25.0) 3 (33.6)
Tumor size (cm), n (%) 0.045
   <6 41 (78.9) 4 (44.4)
   ≥6 11 (21.1) 5 (55.6)
Tumor location, n (%) 0.077
   Body 15 (28.8) 0 (0.0)
   Tail 21 (40.4) 7 (77.8)
   Body and tail 16 (30.8) 2 (22.2)
Radiographic appearance, n (%) 0.390
   Solid 12 (23.1) 3 (33.3)
   Cystic 30 (57.7) 3 (33.3)
   Heterogeneous 10 (19.2) 3 (33.3)
Splenic vessel compression by tumor, n (%) 0.015
   Obvious 12 (23.1) 6 (66.7)
   No/slight 40 (76.9) 3 (33.3)
Pathological diagnosis, n (%) 0.697
   SCN 17 (32.7) 1 (11.1)
   MCN 10 (19.2) 3 (33.3)
   SPN 7 (13.5) 1 (11.1)
   NET 10 (19.2) 2 (22.2)
   Others 8 (15.4) 1 (11.1)
Operative time, mean ± SD (min) 226.4±55.7 227.2±53.1 0.969
EBL, median (IQR) (mL) 50 (20 to 100) 300 (175 to 500) 0.000
Conversion, n (%) 0 (0.0) 1 (11.1) 0.148
LOS, mean ± SD (days) 8.8±6.6 9.4±4.6 0.770
Morbidity, n (%) 7 (13.5) 4 (44.4) 0.047
CR-POPF, n (%) 4 (7.7) 2 (22.2) 0.121
Mortality, n (%) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) N/A

RDP, robotic splenic preservation distal pancreatectomy; RSPDP, robotic splenic preservation distal pancreatectomy; RDPS, robotic distal pancreatosplenectomy; BMI, body mass index; SCN, serous cystic neoplasm; MCN, mucinous cystic neoplasm; SPN, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; EBL, estimated blood loss; LOS, length of stay; CR-POPF, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula; N/A, not applicable.