Table 1. Comparison between RSPDP and RDPS.
Variable | RSPDP (n=52) | RDPS (n=9) | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years), n (%) | 0.477 | ||
<50 | 31 (59.6) | 4 (44.4) | |
≥50 | 21 (40.4) | 5 (55.6) | |
Sex, n (%) | 0.136 | ||
Female | 34 (65.4) | 3 (33.3) | |
Male | 18 (34.6) | 6 (66.7) | |
BMI (kg/m2), n (%) | 0.686 | ||
<24 | 39 (75.0) | 6 (66.7) | |
≥24 | 13 (25.0) | 3 (33.6) | |
Tumor size (cm), n (%) | 0.045 | ||
<6 | 41 (78.9) | 4 (44.4) | |
≥6 | 11 (21.1) | 5 (55.6) | |
Tumor location, n (%) | 0.077 | ||
Body | 15 (28.8) | 0 (0.0) | |
Tail | 21 (40.4) | 7 (77.8) | |
Body and tail | 16 (30.8) | 2 (22.2) | |
Radiographic appearance, n (%) | 0.390 | ||
Solid | 12 (23.1) | 3 (33.3) | |
Cystic | 30 (57.7) | 3 (33.3) | |
Heterogeneous | 10 (19.2) | 3 (33.3) | |
Splenic vessel compression by tumor, n (%) | 0.015 | ||
Obvious | 12 (23.1) | 6 (66.7) | |
No/slight | 40 (76.9) | 3 (33.3) | |
Pathological diagnosis, n (%) | 0.697 | ||
SCN | 17 (32.7) | 1 (11.1) | |
MCN | 10 (19.2) | 3 (33.3) | |
SPN | 7 (13.5) | 1 (11.1) | |
NET | 10 (19.2) | 2 (22.2) | |
Others | 8 (15.4) | 1 (11.1) | |
Operative time, mean ± SD (min) | 226.4±55.7 | 227.2±53.1 | 0.969 |
EBL, median (IQR) (mL) | 50 (20 to 100) | 300 (175 to 500) | 0.000 |
Conversion, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (11.1) | 0.148 |
LOS, mean ± SD (days) | 8.8±6.6 | 9.4±4.6 | 0.770 |
Morbidity, n (%) | 7 (13.5) | 4 (44.4) | 0.047 |
CR-POPF, n (%) | 4 (7.7) | 2 (22.2) | 0.121 |
Mortality, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | N/A |
RDP, robotic splenic preservation distal pancreatectomy; RSPDP, robotic splenic preservation distal pancreatectomy; RDPS, robotic distal pancreatosplenectomy; BMI, body mass index; SCN, serous cystic neoplasm; MCN, mucinous cystic neoplasm; SPN, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; EBL, estimated blood loss; LOS, length of stay; CR-POPF, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula; N/A, not applicable.