Table 2. Comparison of complications between thin and thick ADMs.
| Complication | Total | ADM type = thin | ADM type = thick | P value | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to JP drain removal | 51 (100.0) | 14.67±1 | 15.17±1.02 | 0.731 | 1.020 (0.913–1.139) |
| Complication | 51 (100.0) | 0.715 | |||
| No | 40 (78.4) | 17 (81.0) | 23 (76.7) | Reference | |
| Yes | 11 (21.6) | 4 (19.0) | 7 (23.3) | 1.293 (0.326–5.137) | |
| Seroma | 51 (100.0) | 0.679 | |||
| No | 45 (88.2) | 19 (90.5) | 26 (86.7) | Reference | |
| Yes | 6 (11.8) | 2 (9.5) | 4 (13.3) | 1.462 (0.242–8.820) | |
| Infection | 51 (100.0) | 0.797 | |||
| No | 49 (96.1) | 20 (95.2) | 29 (96.7) | Reference | |
| Yes | 2 (3.9) | 1 (4.8) | 1 (3.3) | 0.690 (0.041–11.684) | |
| Skin necrosis | 51 (100.0) | 0.777 | |||
| No | 48 (94.1) | 20 (95.2) | 28 (93.3) | Reference | |
| Yes | 3 (5.9) | 1 (4.8) | 2 (6.7) | 1.429 (0.121–16.858) | |
| Cellulitis | 51 (100.0) | 0.710 | |||
| No | 47 (92.2) | 19 (90.5) | 28 (93.3) | Reference | |
| Yes | 4 (7.8) | 2 (9.5) | 2 (6.7) | 0.679 (0.088–5.243) | |
| Revision required | 51 (100.0) | 0.955 | |||
| No | 46 (90.2) | 19 (90.5) | 27 (90.0) | Reference | |
| Yes | 5 (9.8) | 2 (9.5) | 3 (10.0) | 1.056 (0.161–6.939) |
Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD. Categoric variables were expressed as sample number and %. Odds ratio: computed using binary logistic regression analysis. ADM, acellular dermal matrix; CI, confidence interval; JP, Jackson-Pratt.