Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 6;45(4):476–487. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2020.103353

Table 1.

Meta-analyses of the efficacy of probiotics counteracting intestinal barrier disruptions secondary to cancer treatment

Study aim Number
of trials/patients
Primary diagnosis Outcome Reference
To evaluate the efficacy of probiotics on the intestinal mucosa barrier indices 17/1242 Colorectal
cancer
Probiotics significantly affect
L/M ratio: SMD = 3.83, p = 0.001
Bifidobacterium/Escherichia ratio (SMD = 3.91, p = 0.000)
Ocludin ratio (SMD = 4.74, p = 0.000)
Bacterial translocation (SMD = 3.12, p = 0.002)
SIgA level (SMD = 2.91, p = 0.004)
CRP level (SMD = 4.21, p = 0.000) – probiotics do not influence
IL-6 level (SMD = 1.33, p = 0.184)
[115]
To assess whether probiotics may prevent cancer therapy-induced diarrhea 7/1091 Probiotics do not prevent or reduce the overall incidence
of diarrhea (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.60-1.09, p = 0.16)
[116]
To establish a link between probiotics and the incidence of cancer surgical infection 7/816 Colorectal
cancer
Probiotics significantly affected:
bacteria in blood: OR = 0.4069 (95% CI: 0.2662-0.6222,
p < 0.0001) infectious complications: OR = 0.5388 (95% CI: 0.4058-0.7154, p < 0.0001)
[117]
To assess whether probiotics may support H. pylori eradication 14/1671 H. pylori infection Probiotic therapy significantly increases rate of H. pylori eradication: OR = 1.84 (95% CI: 1.34-2.54) [118]
30/4302 H. pylori infection Probiotics significantly improve H. pylori eradication rates (APP: RR = 1.122; 95% CI: 1.091-1.153; p < 0.001;
ITT: RR = 1.141; 95% CI: 1.106-1.175; p < 0.001)
[119]

SMD – standardized mean difference, ITT – intention to treat, APP – as-per-protocol, L/M – lactulose/mannitol, RR – relative risk, OR – odds ratio, CI – confidence interval, CRP – C-reactive protein, H. pylori – Helicobacter pylori