Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 29;3(2):80–90. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11186

Table 1.

Comparative studies on impact of high‐ versus low‐dose GC on disease‐related outcomes and treatment‐related adverse events

Certainty Assessment Number of Patients Effect Certainty
No. of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Low‐dose GCs (<30 mg/d) High‐dose GCs (>30 mg/d)

Relative

(95% CI)

Absolute

(95% CI)

Relapse
1 Observational studies Not serious Not serious Not serious Serious a Strong association 20/39 (51.3%) 18/57 (31.6%)

OR 2.28

(0.98 to 5.28)

197 more per 1000

(from 4 fewer to 393 more)

⨁⨁◯◯ LOW

Death
1 Observational studies Not serious Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 2/39 (5.1%) 3/57 (5.3%)

OR 0.97

(0.15 to 6.11)

1 fewer per 1000

(from 44 fewer to 201 more)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

Serious adverse events
1 Observational studies Not serious Not serious Not serious Serious a Strong association 22/39 (56.4%) 45/57 (78.9%)

OR 0.35

(0.14 to 0.85)

222 fewer per 1000

(from 445 fewer to 28 fewer)

⨁⨁◯◯ LOW

See Mutoh et al for reference.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GC, glucocorticoid; OR, odds ratio.

a

The lower versus upper limits of the CI would lead to different clinic decisions.