Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 1;7:624255. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.624255

Table 3.

The cross-comparisons between AUROCs of early warning scores for predicting EDRF.

AUROC NEWS NEWS-C NEWS2 HEMS MEWS qSOFA
0.73
[0.62–0.84]
0.79
[0.69–0.89]
0.59
[0.46–0.72]
0.75
[0.63–0.86]
0.71
[0.59–0.83]
0.62
[0.51–0.74]
NEWS 0.73
[0.62–0.84]
/ 0.07 0.006 0.66 0.49 0.004
NEWS-C 0.79
[0.69–0.89]
0.07 / <0.001 0.31 0.08 <0.001
NEWS2 0.59
[0.46–0.72]
0.006 <0.001 / 0.003 0.02 0.57
HEMS 0.75
[0.63–0.86]
0.66 0.31 0.003 / 0.17 0.008
MEWS 0.71
[0.59–0.83]
0.49 0.08 0.02 0.17 / 0.10
qSOFA 0.62
[0.51–0.74]
0.004 <0.001 0.57 0.008 0.10 /

AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; HEWS, Hamilton Early Warning Score; MEWS, Modified Early Warning Score; NEWS, National Early Warning Score; NEWS-C, modified NEWS; NEWS 2, National Early Warning Score 2; qSOFA, quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment; IRS, intensive respiratory support.