Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 1;7:624255. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.624255

Table 4.

The cross-comparisons between AUROCs of Early Warning Scores for predicting IRS.

AUROC NEWS NEWS-C NEWS2 HEMS MEWS qSOFA
0.86
[0.78–0.95]
0.89
[0.82–0.96]
0.69
[0.57–0.81]
0.87
[0.77–0.97]
0.80
[0.70–0.90]
0.72
[0.61–0.82]
NEWS 0.86
[0.78–0.95]
/ 0.28 0.001 0.82 0.049 <0.001
NEWS-C 0.89
[0.82–0.96]
0.28 / <0.001 0.54 0.03 <0.001
NEWS2 0.69
[0.57–0.81]
0.001 <0.001 / 0.04 0.60
HEMS 0.87
[0.77–0.97]
0.82 0.54 0.003 / 0.01 0.001
MEWS 0.80
[0.70–0.90]
0.049 0.03 0.04 / 0.10
qSOFA 0.72
[0.61–0.82]
<0.001 <0.001 0.60 0.001 0.10 /

AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; HEWS, Hamilton Early Warning Score; MEWS, Modified Early Warning Score; NEWS, National Early Warning Score; NEWS-C, modified NEWS; NEWS 2, National Early Warning Score 2; qSOFA, quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment; IRS, intensive respiratory support.