Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 1;11:600227. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.600227

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The effect of CDK6 expression on overall survival in non-APL AML patients. (A) Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS in chemotherapy only group in non-APL AML patients [CDK6high (n = 36) vs. CDK6low (n = 36): p = 0.76] (cut point: median CDK6 expression level). (B) Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS in auto-/allo-HSCT group in non-APL AML patients [CDK6high (n = 31) vs. CDK6low (n = 32): p = 0.79] (cut point: median CDK6 expression level). (C) Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS in chemotherapy only group in cytogenetically normal AML patients [CDK6high (n = 17) vs. CDK6low (n = 18): p = 0.3] (cut point: median CDK6 expression level). (D) Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS in auto-/allo-HSCT group in cytogenetically normal AML patients [CDK6high (n = 17) vs. CDK6low (n = 18): p = 0.3] (cut point: median CDK6 expression level). (E) The survival analysis of probe 243000_at of 162 cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) patients using the online web tool GenomicScape (cut point: 596.34, p = 0.0036, HR = 1.8); (F) the survival analysis of probe 207143_at of 162 cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) patient (cut point: 337.79, p = 0.048, HR = 1.6). (G) The survival analysis of probe 235287_at of 78 cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) patients using the online web tool Genomicscape (cut off: 596.34, p = 0.033, HR = 2). (H) The survival analysis of probe 235287_at of 162 cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) patients using the online web tool Genomicscape (cut point: 596.34, p = 0.0055, HR = 1.8).