Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 20;15(1):16–25. doi: 10.1177/2049463719871751

Table 3.

Association between back pain (outcome) and exposure variables (exercise, behaviour, heredity and posture), depicted as relative risk – Teutônia, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (n = 525).

Variables Bivariate model
Unadjusted RR (95% CI)
p a Multivariate model
Adjusted RR (95% CI)
p a
Control variables
Age (baseline; years)
 11–12 1 0.929
 13–14 1.00 (0.96–1.05)
 15–16 0.98 (0.90–1.07)
Sex
 Male 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
 Female 1.08 (1.04–1.13) 1.08 (1.04–1.13)
Exposure variables
Exercise
 Physical exercise
  Yes 1 0.946
  No 1.00 (0.94–1.07)
 Physical exercise weekly frequencyb (days/week)
  1–2 1 0.116
  3–4 0.96 (0.91–1.01)
  ⩾5 0.95 (0.90–1.01)
 Competitive exerciseb
  Yes 1 0.156
  No 1.03 (0.99–1.08)
Behaviour
 Time spent watching television per day (hours)
  0–1 1 <0.001 1 0.002
  2–5 0.95 (0.91–0.99) 0.96 (0.92–1.01)
  ⩾6 1.08 (1.01–1.14) 1.07 (1.01–1.13)
 Time spent using computer per day (hours)
  0–1 1 0.094 1 0.115
  2–5 0.98 (0.94–1.03) 1.00 (0.96–1.05)
  ⩾6 1.06 (0.97–1.13) 1.06 (0.99–1.14)
 Time sleeping per night (hours/day)
  0–7 1 0.018 1 0.152
  8–9 0.94 (0.90–0.98) 0.96 (0.92–1.01)
  ⩾10 0.97 (0.90–1.04) 0.96 (0.89–1.04)
 Read and/or study in bed
  No 1 0.019 1 0.500
  Sometimes 1.02 (0.97–1.08) 1.01 (0.96–1.07)
  Yes 1.07 (1.02–1.13) 1.03 (0.98–1.09)
Hereditary
 Parents with back pain
  No 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
  Yes 1.20 (1.14–1.26) 1.16 (1.10–1.23)
Postural
 Sleeping
  Supine 1 0.059 1 0.215
  Lateral decubitus 1.01 (0.94–1.09) 1.04 (0.96–1.12)
  Prone 1.06 (0.98–1.15) 1.06 (0.98–1.14)
 Sitting posture to write
  Adequate 1 0.049 1 0.539
  Inadequate 1.07 (1.01–1.14) 1.02 (0.96–1.09)
 Sitting posture on a bench
  Adequate 1 0.274
  Inadequate 1.04 (0.97–1.11)
 Sitting posture to use computer
  Adequate 1 0.005 1 0.503
  Inadequate 1.08 (1.02–1.13) 1.02 (0.97–1.07)
 Posture to lift object from floor
  Adequate 1 0.808
  Inadequate 0.99 (0.94–1.05)
 Way to carry backpack
  Adequate (symmetrical on both shoulders) 1 <0.001 1 0.037
  Inadequate (asymmetric) 1.09 (1.05–1.13) 1.04 (1.01–1.08)

CI: confidence interval.

Generalized estimating equations were used to perform a Poisson regression model with robust variance errors. We used relative risk (RR) with their respective 95% CIs to measure effects (α = 0.05). The multivariate analysis was adjusted for sex and age and included the exposure variables (p < 0.10 in the bivariate analysis). Bold data reflect statistical significance (p < 0.05).

a

Significant association (p < 0.05).

b

Related only to students in whom the variable was applicable.