Table 3.
Comparison of “During Stimulation” ANCOVA Results from Data-Driven Analyses
| Study 1 | Study 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Source Name | Target Name(s) | T-Values(s) | T-Value(s) |
| Group-Dependent Connections | |||
| ACC | Amygdala | 4.67; 4.50 | |
| IC | 5.63; 5.22; 4.89; 4.29; 4.16 | ||
| Amygdala | NAc | 5.32; 4.31 | |
| Thalamus | 4.40 | ||
| Hippocampus | Amygdala | 4.29; 4.21; 4.21 | |
| Thalamus | 4.33 | ||
| IC | Amygdala | 4.93; 4.80 | |
| NAc | Thalamus | 4.09 | |
| PCC | Hippocampus | 4.08 | 4.12 |
| Thalamus | 5.80 | ||
| PFC | Thalamus | 4.25 | |
| Thalamus | ACC | 4.20 | |
| IC | 4.60; 4.29; 4.01 | 4.65 | |
| VTA | Amygdala | 4.09 | |
| Hippocampus | 4.20 | ||
| Sensitivity-Dependent Connections | |||
| ACC | Amygdala | 4.23 | |
| IC | 4.20 | ||
| Hippocampus | Amygdala | 4.55 | |
| Thalamus | 4.57; 4.09; 4.08; 4.00 | ||
| IC | Amygdala | 5.25; 4.86 | |
| PCC | ACC | 4.61; 4.57 | |
| Thalamus | 4.62 | ||
| Thalamus | IC | 4.72; 4.40 | |
| Group/Sensitivity Interaction-Dependent Connections | |||
| Amygdala | Hippocampus | 4.34 | |
| HG | IC | 4.96 | |
| Hippocampus | Amygdala | 4.04; 4.00 | |
| IC | ACC | 5.07 | |
| PCC | ACC | 4.27 | |
| Hippocampus | 4.48 | ||
| PFC | Thalamus | 4.80 | |
| Thalamus | Hippocampus | 4.53 | 4.15 |
Notes: To be considered significant, t-values needed to surpass the threshold of 3.97 (equivalent to family-wise error rated corrected pFWER < 0.05). If there were multiple significant connections between two regions, the t-values for each were listed. Abbreviations for each region are described in the text (see Data-driven fMRI analyses section).