Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 14;11(4):1729–1740. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7163

TABLE 2.

An ANOVA of 2C DNA values among populations of the four Quercus species

pops Source of difference SS df MS F p‐value
ZJ_A × ZJ_V Between pops 0.04 1 0.04 55.91 4.63E−10**
Within pops 0.04 58 0.71 × 10–3
ZJ_V × ZJ_F Between pops 0.03 1 0.03 38.92 4.62E−08**
Within pops 0.05 61 0.84 × 10–3
ZJ_F × ZJ_G Between pops 0.58 × 10–3 1 0.58 × 10–3 0.62 0.43
Within pops 0.05 56 0.93 × 10–3
ZJ_A × ZJ_F Between pops 0.15 1 0.15 256.89 1.53E−23**
Within pops 0.04 61 0.57 × 10–3
ZJ_A × ZJ_G Between pops 0.15 1 0.15 187.65 2.27E−19**
Within pops 0.04 55 0.78 × 10–3
ZJ_V × ZJ_G Between pops 0.04 1 0.04 33.43 3.61E−07**
Within pops 0.06 55 0.11 × 10–2

ZJ_A represents the Q. acutissima population, ZJ_V represents the Q. variabilis population, ZJ_F represents the Q. fabri population, and ZJ_G represents the Q. serrata var. brevipetiolata population.

**

Statistically different (p < .01).