Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;28(2):601–616. doi: 10.1177/1073191119858416

Table 2.

Goodness-of-Fit Statistics of the CFA and ESEM Models for the SDQ Adolescent and Parent Versions in the Community Sample.

Model χ2 df p RMSEA RMSEA, 90% CI CFI TLI
SDQ adolescent version
 CFA-5F 772.988 265 <.001 .046 [.042, .049] .896 .883
 CFA-6F 525.249 255 <.001 .034 [.030, .038] .945 .935
 ESEM-5F 304.576 185 <.001 .027 [.021, .032] .976 .960
SDQ parent version
 CFA-5F 576.368 265 <.001 .047 [.042, .053] .926 .916
 ESEM-5F 274.950 185 <.001 .030 [.023, .038] .979 .965

Note. df = degrees of freedom; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; SDQ = Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; CFA = confirmatory factor analysis; ESEM = exploratory structural equation modeling. For the SDQ adolescent version, n = 917 and for the SDQ parent version, n = 525.