Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;28(2):601–616. doi: 10.1177/1073191119858416

Table 3.

Standardized Parameter Estimates of the CFA and ESEM Models for the SDQ Adolescent Version.

Item/factor CFA five-factor model CFA six-factor model ESEM five-factor model
ES CP HP SP PB ES CP HP SP PB PCM ES CP HP SP PB
3 .49 .49 .54 .21 .003 −.17 .04
8 .72 .72 .67 .10 0.02 .07 .17
13 .79 .79 .75 .12 −0.01 .05 .09
16 .64 .64 .60 −.18 .06 .12 −.08
24 .78 .78 .72 −.22 .06 .18 −.06
5 .72 .78 .25 .49 .16 .13 .02
7 .45 .05 .36 −.04 .23 .21 −.17 −.30
12 .59 .61 −.08 .66 .05 .03 −.06
18 .64 .67 −.13 .55 .16 .28 .01
22 .60 .62 −.09 .53 .02 .07 −.01
2 .77 .79 −.16 −.004 .90 .13 .13
10 .73 .75 .002 .01 .75 .13 .15
15 .77 .79 .15 .03 .73 −.13 −.002
21 .57 .35 .40 .05 .21 .38 −.14 −.19
25 .64 .50 .28 .12 −.01 .55 −.20 −.25
6 .56 .64 .15 −.11 −.03 .60 −.14
11 .51 .40 .61 .14 .24 −.09 .15 −.27
14 .71 .58 .30 .04 .18 .04 .45 −.25
19 .68 .74 .11 .19 .07 .57 .08
23 .49 .55 .14 .09 −.08 .45 −.01
1 .77 .77 .15 −.42 .03 −.07 .52
4 .46 .45 .01 .01 .03 −.22 .42
9 .62 .62 .06 .18 −.07 −.15 .72
17 .64 .63 −.02 −.13 −.05 −.07 .49
20 .53 .54 −.02 .06 −.02 .10 .68
Factor correlations
ES 1.00 0.28 0.34 0.58 −0.02 1.00 0.33 0.37 0.59 −0.02 −.06 1.00 0.10 0.30 0.41 −0.03
CP 1.00 0.63 0.54 −0.62 1.00 0.52 0.50 −0.52 −.42 1.00 0.38 0.24 −0.34
HP 1.00 0.24 −0.31 1.00 0.17 −0.20 .35 1.00 0.11 −0.23
SP 1.00 −0.45 1.00 −0.28 −.09 1.00 −0.12
PB 1.00 1.00 −.71 1.00
PCM 1.00

Note. SDQ = Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; ESEM = exploratory structural equation modeling; CFA = confirmatory factor analysis; ES = emotional symptoms; CP = conduct problems; HP = hyperactivity/attention problems; SP = social problems; PB = prosocial behavior; PCM = positive construal method. Per item, its loading on its intended factor is printed in bold.