Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 28;11:621538. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.621538

TABLE 2.

Effect of carveol on oxidative enzymes.

Treatment GSH (μmol/mg protein) GST (nmoles of CDNS conjugated/min/mg protein) TBARS (nmoles Tbras/min/mg protien)
Saline 74.88 ± 13.78 25.42 ± 1.30 79.32 ± 0.70
APAP 400 mg/kg 6.30 ± 4.97*** 1.78 ± 1.50*** 215.58 ± 5.82***
APA + Carveol 5 mg/kg 44.4 ± 9.26# 4.67 ± 0.91 192.54 ± 2.80
APA + Carveol 10 mg/kg 54.49 ± 9.98## 8.83 ± 1.62# 167.78 ± 2.164#
APA + Carveol 15 mg/kg 62.29 ± 18.82### 14.2 ± 1.43## 131.74 ± 0.64##
APAP + Silymarin 50 mg/kg 66.68 ± 11.45### 18.20 ± 2.31## 115.83 ± 2.164##

The symbols ∗∗∗ and ### represent p < 0.001, while the symbol ## or # represents p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, n = 7/group. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. The samples were processed from cohort 1.