TABLE 4.
ATRA abrogated the effects of carveol.
| Treatment | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | TP (g/dl) | ALP (U/L) | LDH (mg/dl) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saline | 67 ± 5.4 | 89 ± 5.32 | 6.8 ± 1.56 | 110 ± 2.7 | 441.33 ± 14.46 |
| APAP 400 mg/kg + ATRA 10 mg/kg | 456 ± 13.25βββ | 634 ± 16.35βββ | 2.6 ± 1.7ββ | 545 ± 9.89βββ | 3653 ± 4.03βββ |
| APAP + ATRA + Carveol 15 mg/kg | 219 ± 12.56$$$ | 376 ± 3.45$$$ | 5.3 ± 1.21$$ | 278 ± 7.89$$$ | 2162 ± 21.72$$ |
| APAP + ATRA + Silymarin 50 mg/kg | 183 ± 14.23$$$ | 312 ± 8.64$$$ | 5.8 ± 2.1$$ | 267 ± 5.78$$$ | 2017.66 ± 25.91$$ |
ATRA augmented the serum level of LFTs and attenuated the TP, while carveol significantly reduced LFT levels compared to those in the ATRA + APAP group, and increased the total protein level. The symbols βββ and $$$ represent significant difference values of p < 0.001, while the symbol $$ represents p < 0.01 values of significant differences, the symbol $ represents a significant difference relative to APAP + ATRA, while β represents a significant difference relative to the saline group. The data are expressed as means ± SEM and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test, n = 5. The samples were processed from cohort 2.