Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 19;34(1):e14652. doi: 10.1111/dth.14652

TABLE 2.

The comparison of pandemic‐related factors between two groups of patients with chronic urticaria

COVID‐19‐associated parameters Total (n = 194) Aggravated group (n = 38) Non‐aggravated group (n = 156) P‐value
Working status during the pandemic
None, n (%) 140 (72.2) 29 (76.3) 111 (71.2) .405
At home, n (%) 15 (7.7) 4 (5.7) 11 (7.1)
At the workplace, n (%) 39 (20.1) 5 (17.5) 34 (21.8)
Adherence to quarantine, n (%) 184 (94.8) 33 (86.8) 151 (96.8) .027
Patients using self‐protective equipment, n (%) 192 (99) 38 (100) 154 (98.7) .483
Patients who had COVID‐19 positive individuals in their close environment, n (%) 39 (20.1) 8 (21.1) 31 (19.9) .871
Patients with history of contact to a COVID‐19 positive individual, n (%) 8 (4.1) 3 (7.9) 5 (3.2) .229
Patients with COVID‐19‐like symptoms, n (%) 20 (10.3) 7 (18.4) 13 (8.3) .078
Patients underwent a PCR test for COVID‐19, n (%) 14 (7.2) 3 (7.9) 11 (7.1) .740
Patients with a positive PCR test and a definite diagnosis of COVID‐19, n (%) 2 (1.0) 1 (2.6) 1 (0.6) .354

Note: A statistically significant P‐value is highlighted in bold. Categorical variables were compared using chi square test and non‐parametric continuous variables were compared using Mann Whitney U test. P < .05 was accepted as statistical significant.