Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 7;12(2):185–194. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00540

Table 1. Comparison of the Docked Data Sets Obtained by Derivatization Design (DD) and Deep Generative Design (DGD).

  DD DGD overlap
size of training seta 8 1370 8
docked set size 6748 6427 0
scaffold count (SC)a 483 818 124
SC with 2–3 substituents 89% 74% N/A
LBM count 6748 5394 6
BM count 1404 2828 86
Glide hit rate 34% 9% N/A
best Glide XP scoreb –17.7 –16.4 N/A
avg hit docking LEa 0.50 0.46 N/A
avg hit docking LIPEa 7.8 6.9 N/A
top 50 XP Glide score –15.5 –13 N/A
new motifs 6 4 1
b

Ponatinib XP Glide score is −15.4.