Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 16;37(4):e2020016. doi: 10.36141/svdld.v37i4.9584

Table 5.

All-Cause Mortality Comparisons and Cox Proportional Hazard Model results

Mortality HR (95% CI) p-value
Yes (n=20) No (n=180)
Study Group
AAV Subjects 12 (12.0%) 88 (88.0%) 1.97 (0.80, 4.87) 0.1402
Control Subjects 8 (8.0%) 92 (92.0%)
Gender
Male 14 (16.3%) 72 (83.7%) 3.19 (1.23, 8.31) 0.0174
Female 6 (5.3%) 108 (94.7%)
Visual Assessment
V-LAA- yes 13 (18.3%) 58 (81.7%) 3.43 (1.37, 8.61) 0.0085
V-LAA- no 7 (5.4%) 122 (94.6%)
Quantitative Assessment
Adj e950 >5% 7 (12.7%) 48 (87.3%) 1.56 (0.62, 3.91) 0.3440
Adj e950 <5% 13 (9.0%) 132 (91.0%)
Pulmonary Function Test
Obstruction 7 (14.6%) 41 (85.4%) 2.24 (0.88, 5.68) 0.0891
No obstruction 11 (7.9%) 128 (92.1%)
Multivariable Cox PH Model HR 95% CI Adjusted p-value
Age 1.10 1.05, 1.16 0.0002
Gender (M) 2.93 1.12, 7.69 0.0290
AAV 2.33 0.92, 5.90 0.0729

AAV= ANCA-associated Vasculitis, V-LAA= Visual Low attenuation areas