Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 9;6(1):e01376-20. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.01376-20

TABLE 1.

Sugar metabolites significantly different between human milk or milk formula diet groups across gastrointestinal contents of piglets at postnatal day 21

Gastrointestinal content HMa
MFa
FCb FDRc VIPd
Avg abundance SEM Avg abundance SEM
Duodenum
    1,5-Anhydroglucitol 14,720 3,485 3,396 541 4.33 <0.01 2.31
    Threonic acid 40,594 7,203 95,870 12,252 0.42 0.09 1.87
    Maltotriose 301 69 1,416 617 0.21 0.12 1.64
    Glucose 8,578 2,132 19,168 3,292 0.45 0.12 1.58
    Ribonic acid 1,523 323 2,755 318 0.55 0.13 1.56
Jejunum
    Melezitose 241 41 8,326 2,680 0.03 <0.01 2.51
    Fucose 231,611 94,955 20,372 3,126 11.37 0.02 2.24
    Maltotriose 1,205 473 15,207 5,368 0.08 0.05 2.04
    Tartaric acid 408 45 1,951 453 0.21 0.11 1.81
    Panose 997 235 24,736 21,234 0.04 0.13 1.76
    Conduritol-beta-expoxide 13,003 1,664 7,298 1,050 1.78 0.15 1.7
Ileum
    3,6-Anhydro-d-galactose 1,173 434 15,228 5,331 0.08 0.01 2.48
    Melezitose 711 195 24,609 9,825 0.03 0.01 2.39
    Maltotriose 4,535 1,796 191,435 6,8277 0.02 0.05 2.1
    Panose 2,658 819 22,404 6,352 0.12 0.1 1.88
    Tartaric acid 1,034 185 6,099 2,286 0.17 0.13 1.77
a

Mean of normalized (mTIC) peak intensities (mz/rt) for human milk (HM) or milk formula (MF) after MetaboAnalyst analyses; n = 8 to 11/group.

b

FC, fold change of HM mean to MF mean.

c

FDR = false discovery rate; Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted P value.

d

VIP = variable importance in projection in PLS-DA models using all annotated metabolites to compare HM and MF within each intestinal section.