Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 30;24(2):158–169. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa078

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Effects of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and alogliptin on the escape latency (A) and time spent in the target quadrant (B) in the Morris water maze (MWM) test; the novel object recognition (NOR) discrimination index (C); and the latency time (D), mean ambulation frequency (E), mean grooming frequency (F), and mean rearing frequency (G) in the open field test. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 16). Statistical analysis was done using 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test, except for the escape latency in MWM test, which was analyzed using repeated measures 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. *P < .05 vs control, #P < .05 vs LPS group. ALO; alogliptin.