Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Identity (Mahwah, N J). 2015 Jul 30;15(3):202–220. doi: 10.1080/15283488.2015.1055532

TABLE 3.

Model Fit Statistics for Latent Profile Solutions

No. of profiles No. of free parameters AIC BIC ABIC VLMR p value E
Models for Black college students
2 44 8,754.29 8,954.41 8,814.70 <.001 .74
3 76 8,548.35 8,894.01 8,652.70 <.01 .84
4 108 8,424.08 8,915.28 8,572.36 <.001 .77
Models for Asian American college students
2 44 15,143.15 15,372.06 15,229.12 <.001 .68
3 76 14,906.41 15,303.17 15,055.41 <.01 .73
4 108 14,744.28 15,308.91 14,956.33 <.01 .71
5 144 14,648.84 15,381.33 14,923.93 .10 .69
Models for Latino college students
2 44 14,599.10 14,811.64 14,671.89 <.001 .71
3 76 14,381.55 14,762.81 14,521.41 .08 .69

Note. Fit statistics for the best fitting model are in bold. AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; ABIC = adjusted Bayesian information criterion; VLMR = Vuong-Lo-Mendal-Rubin likelihood ratio; E = entropy.