Table 1.
The most frequent chest US findings reported in mentioned studies and their relative frequency
Author | N. of Patient | Type of Patient | B-Line | PleuralLine irreg | White lung | Consolidation | Pleural effusion | Broncho-grams | Pleuralthickening | A-lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Huang et al. [34] | 20 | ED** | 37.9% | 15% | – | 22.1% | 18.8% | 15.4% | 14.% | – |
Peng et al. [25] | 20 | – | NA* | NA* | – | NA* | NA* | NA* | NA* | NA* |
Lomoro et al. [36] | 58 | ED** | 100% | – | – | 27.3% | 4.5% | – | 13.6% | 4.5% |
Poggiali et al. [37] | 12 | ED** | NA* | NA* | – | NA* | NA* | NA* | NA* | – |
Yusukawa et al. [38] | 10 | ED** | 100% | 100% | 50% | – | – | – | 100% | – |
Musolino et al. [39] | 10 | ED** | 70% | 60% | 10% | 10% | 0% | – | – | – |
Fonsi et al. [22] | 44 | ED** | 100% | – | – | 45% | 0% | 39% | 86% | 20% |
*We entered NA (not available) in those cases where the authors didn’t provide a more accurate value for the findings
**We entered ED (Emergency Department) in those cases where patients have been subjected to LUS in the emergency Department