Table 2. Decoding attention type, agent, and the interaction between the two, within the six ROIs.

For definition of ROIs, see Figure 2. Mean decoding accuracy (%), 95% confidence interval (based on bootstrap distribution), and p value (based on permutation testing) are shown for each of the six ROIs. Results shown for decoding endogenous (endo) versus exogenous (exo) attention type, self versus other agent type, and the interaction between the two variables. * indicates significant p values that survived correction for multiple comparisons across all six ROIs (FDR-corrected p<0.05).

		L TPJ	R TPJ	L STS	R STS	MPFC	Precuneus
Endo vs. Exo	Mean accuracy	52.9%	51.4%	50.4%	48.0%	49.5%	50.2%
	95% CI	50.7–55.2	49.1–53.9	47.8–52.8	45.9–50.1	47.6–51.4	48.5–51.8
	P value	0.0046*	0.1148	0.3518	0.9547	0.6439	0.4428
Self vs. Other	Mean accuracy	53.0%	51.0%	52.3%	51.3%	52.6%	52.7%
	95% CI	50.1–55.6	48.5–53.4	50.6–54.1	48.9–54.1	50.5–55.0	50.4–55.0
	P value	0.0053*	0.1974	0.0204*	0.1241	0.0105*	0.0099*
(Self vs. Other) × (Endo vs. Exo)	Mean accuracy diff	1.6%	1.5%	2.0%	−3.0%	2.5%	0.6%
	95% CI	−2.7–6.3	−3.6–6.5	−2.7–6.3	−7.4–1.1	−2.3–6.7	−5.5–5.5
	P value	0.2430	0.2639	0.1967	0.8944	0.1414	0.3900