Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 8;2021:3948638. doi: 10.1155/2021/3948638

Table 3.

Comparison of outcomes between the static group and 3D-printed group.

Static group (n = 22) 3D-printed articular group (n = 20) p value
Interval time (wk) 13.1 (8-24) 12.8 (9-22) 0.75
Interim reinfection rate 1/22 1/20 0.95
Bone loss 22/22 4/20 0.00
 Femoral bone loss(mm) 9.6 (5 ~ 20) 1.7 (0 ~ 10) 0.00
 Tibial bone loss(mm) 5.5 (0 ~ 10) 1 (0 ~ 5) 0.00
TTO surgery 4/22 0/20 0.04
Second-stage operation time(min) 119 (75~150) 98 (65~135) 0.00
Operation bleeding volume 439 (250~650) 358 (150~600) 0.02
Preoperative KSS
 Clinical score 42 ± 5.7 40 ± 6.2 0.28
 Function score 29 ± 5.7 28 ± 5.4 0.51
 Total score 71 ± 10.5 68 ± 11 0.35
Interim KSS
 Clinical score 60 ± 6.3 75 ± 11.5 0.00
 Function score 38 ± 3.3 42 ± 3.6 0.00
 Total score 98 ± 8.7 117 ± 14.4 0.00
Postoperative KSS
 Clinical score 73 ± 5.8 82 ± 3.9 0.00
 Function score 42 ± 4.6 49 ± 5.0 0.00
 Total score 115 ± 9.9 131 ± 8.9 0.00
Mean ROM (degree)
 Preoperative ROM 71 (30~110) 73 (23~105) 0.74
 Interim ROM 1 (0 ~ 8) 88 (80~100) 0.00
 Postoperation ROM 80 (70~110) 94 (80~115) 0.00
Serious joint mobility disorder 5/22 4/20 0.83
Reinfection rate 1/22 1/20 0.95
Satisfaction rate 12/22 18/20 0.01

TTO: tibial tuberosity osteotomy; KSS: knee society score; ROM: range of motion.