Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;24(1):299–318. doi: 10.1007/s11218-021-09612-3

Table 4.

Regression analysis for engagement items at condition 2

Predictor variable Behavioural engagement Emotional engagement Cognitive engagement
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
1. Age .19 .25 .13 .10 .10 .04 .24 .26 .21
2. # of Students  − .12  − .17  − .01  − .10  − .10  − .01  − .09  − .11 .03
3. Year .02  − .01 .01 .20 .14 .14  − .06  − .07  − .10
4. MAP C1 .06  − .16  − .11  − .22 .10  − .17
5. MAV C1 .14  − .05 .03  − .10 .25 .05
6. PAP C1 .29 .15  − .17  − .19 .04  − .04
7. PAV C1  − .09 .04  − .03 .08  − .33*  − .19
8. DV C1 .05 .18 .46** .40** .10 .20
9. MAP C2 .52*** .41** .47***
10. MAV C2 .17 .04 .23*
11. PAP C2  − .10  − .05 .14
12. PAV C2 .20 .08 .01
Adjusted R2 .03 .11 .40*** .07 .16** .27*** .03 .13* .50***

Note: * p < .025, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, DV = The associated Dependent Variable as measured at C1