Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 1;14(2):249–268. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00474-z

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics of subjects in the clinical studies (full analysis population)

Interventional study in subjects with insomniaa Observational study in good sleepers (N = 103)
Full sample
(N = 114)
Exit interviews
(N = 41)
Age, years
Mean (SD) 51 (12) 57 (10) 45 (17)
 Median (range) 53 (19–74) 57 (33–74) 44 (18–74)
Sex, n (%)
 Female 74 (65) 24 (59) 62 (60)
Race, n (%)
 Black or African American 23 (20) 13 (32) 25 (24)
 Asian 0 0 2 (2)
 White/Caucasian 91 (80) 28 (68) 70 (68)
 Other 0 0 4 (4)
 Unknown 0 0 2 (2)
Ethnicity, n (%)
 Hispanic or Latino 10 (9) 5 (12) 10 (10)
 Not Hispanic or Latino 104 (91) 36 (88) 88 (85)
 Not disclosed 0 0 5 (5)
ISI total score at screening, n (%)
 0–7 (no clinically significant insomnia) 0
 8–14 (subthreshold insomnia) 0
 15–21 (moderate insomnia 86 (75)
 22–28 (severe insomnia) 28 (25)
Severity of daytime sleepiness at baseline based on PGA-S, n (%)
 None/very mild/mild 9 (8) 77 (75)
 Moderate 40 (35) 22 (21)
 Severe 61 (54) 4 (4)
 Missing 4 (4) 0
Current sleep-related health, n (%)b
 Excellent 28 (27)
 Very good 47 (46)
 Good 25 (24)
 Fair 3 (3)

DSM-IV Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, DSM-5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, ISI Insomnia Severity Index, PGA-S Patient Global Assessment of Disease Severity, SD standard deviation

aAccording to DSM-5

bCurrent sleep-related health was assessed by asking participants to rate their current health on a 5-point scale, severity of sleepiness over the previous 3 months on a 6-point scale, and average sleepiness in the previous week on a 10-point scale