Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 4;58(3):1005–1013. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04615-y

Table 3.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the fitted model

Source df SS MS F value p value prob > F
pH (R2 = 0.87)
 Model 5 1.80 0.36 9.11 0.0057 s
 Lack of fit 3 0.25 0.083 11.54 0.0194 s
 Pure error 4 0.029 7.16 × 10−3
BI (R2 = 0.82)
 Model 5 6.02 1.20 6.18 0.0167 s
 Lack of fit 3 0.63 0.21 1.14 0.4331 ns
 Pure error 4 0.73 0.18
DPPH (R2 = 0.69)
 Model 5 7928.11 1585.62 3.11 0.0858 ns
 Lack of fit 3 274.74 91.58 0.11 0.9491 ns
 Pure error 4 3297.95 824.49
TEAC (R2 = 0.61)
 Model 5 0.83 0.17 2.12 0.1776 ns
 Lack of fit 3 0.15 0.051 0.51 0.6947 ns
 Pure error 4 0.39 0.099
ORAC (R2 = 0.96)
 Model 5 89.31 17.86 29.97 0.0001 s
 Lack of fit 3 3.98 1.33 27.82 0.0039 s
 Pure error 4 0.19 0.048
HMF (R2 = 0.87)
 Model 6 5.79 0.97 6.95 0.0163 s
 Lack of fit 2 0.82 0.41 128.31 0.0002 s
 Pure error 4 0.013 3.196 × 10−3
AC (R2 = 0.83)
 Model 5 95,273.58 19,054.72 6.80 0.0129 s
 Lack of fit 3 19,626.08 6542.03 23,661.84 < 0.0001 s
 Pure error 4 1.11 0.28

df degrees of freedom, SS sum of squares, MS mean square, ns not significant, s significant; significance level of p < 0.05