Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 11;58(3):1190–1198. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04632-x

Table 1.

Experimental design matrix with numerical factors consisting of 20 experiments and the effects of factors on responses

Run Microwave power density (X1) (kWL−1) Solid/Solvent ratio (X2) (gL−1) Extraction Time (X3) (s) TPC (mg GAEg−1DL) NC (mg Ng−1DL)
5 0.2 8 30 8.484 4.10
2 1.4 8 30 14.379 3.45
4 0.2 20 30 4.219 4.55
8 1.4 20 30 4.211 5.66
1 0.2 8 240 11.679 5.33
16 1.4 8 240 22.863 7.40
17 0.2 20 240 6.822 10.05
7 1.4 20 240 14.994 13.12
19 0.2 14 135 7.381 9.35
14 1.4 14 135 15.047 9.89
18 0.8 8 135 20.214 7.40
11 0.8 20 135 10.066 10.60
3 0.8 14 30 8.005 5.01
10 0.8 14 240 11.996 8.89
15 0.8 14 135 11.850 9.65
12 0.8 14 135 13.057 9.33
20 0.8 14 135 12.757 9.25
9 0.8 14 135 12.854 9.85
13 0.8 14 135 13.143 9.57
6 0.8 14 135 13.579 9.69