Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;58(3):1110–1123. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04625-w

Table 4.

DPPH and ABTS activities of extracts

Spices DPPH assay (mg ascorbic acid eq/g spice) ABTS assay (g trolox eq/100 g spice)
Aqueous extracts Ethanol/water (80/20: v/v) Methanol/water/acetic acid (70/25/5: v/v/v) Aqueous extracts Ethanol/water (80/20: v/v) Methanol/water/acetic acid (70/25/5: v/v/v)
X. africana fruit 165.8 ± 2.68d 179.29 ± 3.48c 182.24 ± 2.41c 7.190 ± 0.003c 1.294 ± 0.002d 0.466 ± 0.013a
A. sulcatum fruit 27.47 ± 1.60b 44.44 ± 1.28a 37.71 ± 0.36a 0.529 ± 0.004b 0.454 ± 0.004a 2.628 ± 0.026d
A. sulcatum bulb 16.43 ± 2.86a 83.09 ± 2.33b 72.56 ± 2.14b 0.047 ± 0.002a 0.381 ± 0.00b 2.141 ± 0.026b
H. zenkeri bark 159.18 ± 2.88c 179.37 ± 0.33c 180.86 ± 2.73c 9.247 ± 0.004d 0.939 ± 0.004c 2.331 ± 0.066c

Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation

Superscript letters (a–d) represents the significant differences (p < 0.05) between the rows and within columns