Table 4.

Relationships between social network metrics and improvement in stroke rehabilitation scores.

Social Network Metric	Stroke rehabilitation metric
		12-week Arm motor Fugl-Meyer score improvement	12-week Walk time improvement	12-week Geriatric depression score improvement
	Network size	r = 0.06	r = 0.62	r = 0.68
		p = 0.85	p = 0.02	p= 0.02
	Network density	r = 0.75	r = 0.78	r = 0.27
		p= 0.003	p= 0.003	p = 0.39
	Network constraint	r = 0.03	r = −0.14	r = 0.22
		p = 0.92	p = 0.66	p = 0.50
	Effective size	r = −0.57	r = −0.46	r = 0.06
		p = 0.04	p = 0.11	p = 0.86
	Maximum degree	r = 0.19	r = 0.58	r = −0.42
		p = 0.53	p = 0.04	p = 0.18
	Percentage kin	r = 0.17	r = 0.05	r = 0.31
		p = 0.57	p = 0.87	p = 0.32
	Percentage who exercise	r = −0.42	r = 0.03	r = −0.33
		p = 0.15	p = 0.91	p = 0.30
	Percentage who smoke	r = 0.14	r = 0.01	r = −0.06
		p = 0.64	p = 0.97	p = 0.85

p-values using Spearman rank-order correlation. Bolded values are statistically significant.