Table 5.

Comparison of TR and control patient social networks.

	TR cohort (n = 13) [mean (±SD)]	Control cohort (n = 176) [mean (±SD)]	pa
Network size	8.3 (7.0–9.7)	6.7 (6.0–7.4)	0.01
Network Density	0.74 (0.64–0.83)	0.82 (0.78–0.85)	0.05
Network Constraint	0.46 (0.42–0.49)	0.58 (0.54–0.61)	0.07
Effective size	3.8 (3.4–4.3)	2.9 (2.6–3.2)	0.005
Maximum degree	6.2 (5.2–7.1)	4.8 (4.3–5.2)	0.04
Percentage who exercise	0.51 (0.35–0.67)	0.44 (0.38–0.49)	0.41
Percentage who smoke	0.11 (−0.06–0.27)	0.17 (0.13–0.21)	0.15
Percentage kin	0.49 (0.41–0.57)	0.61 (0.56–0.67)	0.10

^ap-values using Wilcoxon signed rank-test. Bolded values are statistically significant.