Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 15;11:3840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83321-x

Table 1.

General characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

Author Year Language Country Diagnostic criteria Source of control Sample size (case/control) Method Genotype HWE NOS Ref
Case Control
G A GG GA AA G A GG GA AA
Bu 2014 English China IDF HB 200/200 RFLP 351 49 162 27 11 384 16 188 8 4 Yes 7 20
Uzma 2019 English Pakistan IDF HB 224/200 RFLP 301 147 100 101 23 280 120 102 76 22 Yes 8 21
Vani 2012 English India NCEPATP III HB 269/272 RFLP 429 109 169 91 9 502 42 230 42 0 Yes 6 22
Zhao 2013 Chinese China NCEPATP III HB 600/600 Taqman 1083 117 488 107 5 1142 58 543 56 1 Yes 7 23
Catherine 2010 English France NCEPATP III PB 877/877 Golden Gate Assay 1549 205 683 183 11 1494 260 635 224 18 Yes 6 24
Ranbir 2012 English India NCEPATP III HB 245/321 RFLP 236 254 11 214 20 343 299 56 231 34 Yes 8 25
Aline 2005 English France NCEPATP III PB 601/594 RFLP 496 79 198 73 3 1409 269 599 211 29 Yes 7 26
Gong 2016 Chinese China CDS HB 119/60 RFLP 204 34 89 26 4 111 9 51 9 0 Yes 7 27
Fan 2019 Chinese China CDS HB 48/60 RFLP 81 15 35 11 2 113 7 53 7 0 Yes 8 28
Seyed 2015 English Iran IDF HB 94/128 RFLP 122 66 41 40 20 168 88 60 48 20 Yes 7 29
Szkup 2018 English Poland IDF PB 118/298 Melting curves 201 35 85 31 2 515 81 226 63 9 Yes 8 30

HB hospital based, PB population based, IDF the International Diabetes Federation, NCEPATP III the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III, HWE Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium, CDS Chinese Diabetes Society, RFLP restriction fragment length polymorphism, NOS Newcastle–Ottawa Score.