Table 2.
Frequency of exposures related to care according to SARS-CoV-2 PCR status, univariate and multivariable analysis. Healthcare workers, March–April 2020.
| PCR result |
Univariate OR | p | Adjusted ORa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 86 |
(95% CI) | (95% CI) | |||
| Positive: 27 | Negative: 59 | ||||
| n (%) | n (%) | ||||
| Age | |||||
| <44 | 9 (33.3) | 35 (59.3) | ref | ref | |
| >44 | 18 (66.7) | 24 (40.7) | 2.9 (1.2–7.9) | 0.03 | 5.2 (1.4–22.5) |
| Gender | |||||
| Female | 22 (81.5) | 41 (69.5) | ref | ref | |
| Male | 5 (18.5) | 18 (30.5) | 0.5 (0.2–1.5) | 0.2 | 1.5 (0.3–6.3) |
| Systematic use of mask | |||||
| Yes | 14 (70.0) | 49 (98.0) | ref | ref | |
| No | 6 (30.0) | 1 (2.0) | 21.0 (3.2–414.6) | 0.007 | 13.9 (1.8–293.0) |
| Missing datab:16 | |||||
| Ward type | |||||
| COVID-19 free ward | 13 (48.1) | 21 (35.6) | ref | ref | |
| COVID-19 ward | 14 (51.9) | 38 (64.4) | 0.6 (0.2–1.5) | 0.3 | 0.7 (0.2–3.2) |
| Procedure involving patient airways | |||||
| No | 11 (50.0) | 36 (65.5) | ref | ref | |
| Yes | 11 (50.0) | 19 (34.5) | 1.9 (0.7–5.2) | 0.2 | 2.6 (0.6–12.5) |
| Missing datac: 9 | |||||
| Profession | |||||
| Physiciansd | 4 (14.8) | 14 (23.7) | 0.7 (0.2–4.3) | 0.7 | |
| Nursese | 11 (40.7) | 22 (37.3) | 1.3 (0.4–4.3) | 0.7 | |
| Nursing assistants | 6 (22.2) | 8 (13.6) | 1.9 (0.5–8.0) | 0.4 | |
| Support staff | 6 (22.2) | 15 (25.4) | ref | ||
| Access to a locker | |||||
| No | 9 (37.5) | 10 (17.9) | ref | ||
| Yes | 15 (62.5) | 46 (82.1) | 0.4 (0.1–1.1) | 0.06 | |
| Missing data:6 | |||||
| Contact with infected coworker | |||||
| No or unknown | 13 (52.0) | 36 (64.3) | ref | ||
| Yes | 12 (48.0) | 20 (35.7) | 1.7 (0.6–4.4) | 0.3 | |
| Missing data: 5 | |||||
a
Multivariable logistic regression analysis final model.
b
Fisher-test: p = 0.25.
c
Fisher-test: p = 0.13.
d
Also include residents and medical students.
e
Also include physiotherapist.