Table 3.
Frequency of community related exposure: in-and-out hospital according to SARS-CoV-2 PCR status univariate and multivariable analysis. Hospital staff members, March-April 2020.
| PCR result |
Univariate OR | p | Adjusted ORa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 99 |
(95% CI) | (95% CI) | |||
| Positive: 28 | Negative: 71 | ||||
| n (%) | n (%) | ||||
| Age | |||||
| <44 | 9 (32.1) | 40 (56.3) | ref | ref | |
| >44 | 19 (67.9) | 31 (43.7) | 2.9 (1.2–7.9) | 0.03 | 6.7 (1.7–37.7) |
| Gender | |||||
| Female | 22 (78.6) | 50 (70.4) | ref | ref | |
| Male | 6 (21.4) | 21 (29.6) | 0.7 (0.2–1.8) | 0.4 | 0.8 (0.2–2.36) |
| Meetingsb | |||||
| None or meetings with mask | 16 (59.3) | 60 (93.8) | ref | ref | |
| Meetings without mask | 11 (40.7) | 4 (6.2) | 10.3 (3.1–41.4) | <0.001 | 21.3 (4.5–143.9) |
| Missing datac: 8 | |||||
| Child < 15 years old at home | |||||
| No | 10 (43.5) | 44 (62) | ref | ref | |
| Yes | 13 (56.5) | 27 (38) | 2.1 (0.8–5.6) | 0.1 | 3.1 (0.9–12.9) |
| Missing data: 5 | |||||
| Private social gathering | |||||
| No | 18 (78.3) | 61 (91.0) | ref | ref | |
| Yes | 5 (21.7) | 6 (9.0) | 2.8 (0.7–10.5) | 0.1 | 10.0 (1.3–91.0) |
| Missing datad: 9 | |||||
| Active smoking | |||||
| No | 25 (92.6) | 54 (76.1) | ref | ||
| Yes | 2 (7.4) | 17 (23.9) | 0.3 (0.04–1.0) | 0.08 | |
| Missing data:1 | |||||
| Meals with coworkers | |||||
| No | 5 (18.5) | 19 (28.4) | ref | ||
| Yes | 22 (81.5) | 48 (71.6) | 1.7 (0.6–5.8) | 0.3 | |
| Missing data:5 | |||||
| Suspected COVID-19 at home | |||||
| No | 22 (78.6) | 61 (87.1) | ref | ||
| Yes | 6 (21.4) | 9 (12.9) | 1.9 (0.6–5.7) | 0.3 | |
| Missing data:1 | |||||
| Type of transportation | |||||
| Personal | 23 (82.1) | 54 (77.1) | ref | ||
| Public | 5 (17.9) | 16 (22.9) | 1.4 (0.5–4.6) | 0.6 | |
| Missing data:1 | |||||
a
Multivariable logistic regression analysis final model.
b
Meetings with variable number of participants.
c
Fisher-test: p = 0.43.
d
Fisher-test: p = 0.11.