Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 15;4(2):e2037199. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37199

Table 3. Summary of Post Hoc Analysis of Generalized Estimated Equation Analysisa.

Measurement Postintervention Follow-up
Mean adjusted change (95% CI) P value Effect size Mean adjusted change (95% CI) P value Effect size
Primary outcomes (actigraphy-assessed)b
Sleep efficiency, %
Exercise vs control 3.5 (1.8 to 5.2) <.001c 0.42 3.3 (1.4 to 5.2) <.001c 0.35
Tai chi vs control 3.4 (1.6 to 5.1) <.001c 0.39 6.2 (4.4 to 8.1)d <.001c 0.69
Tai chi vs exercise 0.2 (−1.5 to 1.9) .85 0.03 2.9 (1.1 to 4.8) .002b 0.35
Wake time after sleep onset, min
Exercise vs control −17.0 (−24.9 to −9.0) <.001c 0.46 −23.0 (−31.7 to −14.2)d <.001c 0.59
Tai chi vs control −13.3 (−21.3 to −5.2) .001c 0.31 −27.1 (−35.8 to −18.4)d <.001c 0.65
Tai chi vs exercise 3.7 (−4.2 to 11.7) .36 0.15 −4.1 (−12.6 to 4.4) .34 0.06
No. of awakenings
Exercise vs control −2.8 (−4.0 to −1.6)d <.001c 0.48 −2.0 (−3.3 to −0.6)d .004 0.44
Tai chi vs control −2.2 (−3.5 to −1.0) <.001c 0.42 −2.8 (−4.1 to −1.4)d <.001c 0.55
Tai chi vs exercise 0.6 (−0.6 to 1.8)d .35 0.05 −0.8 (−2.1 to 0.5) .24 0.11
Sleep onset latency, min
Exercise vs control −0.4 (−2.2 to 1.4) .68 0.0002 −2.5 (−4.5 to −0.6) .01 0.24
Tai chi vs control −1.4 (−3.2 to 0.4) .12 0.12 −3.8 (−5.8 to −1.9) <.001c 0.47
Tai chi vs exercise −1.1 (−2.8 to 0.7) .24 0.12 −1.3 (−3.2 to 0.6) .17 0.23
Secondary outcomese
PSQI
Exercise vs control −1.1 (−1.9 to −0.3) .01 0.31 −0.9 (−1.8 to −0.1) .03 0.29
Tai chi vs control −2.9 (−3.6 to −2.1) <.001 0.83 −1.6 (−2.4 to −0.8) <.001 0.49
Tai chi vs exercise −1.8 (−2.5 to −1.0) <.001 0.52 −0.6 (−1.4 to 0.2) .17 0.2
ISI
Exercise vs control −2.2 (−3.3 to −1.0) <.001 0.35 −2.1 (−3.2 to −0.9) <.001 0.37
Tai chi vs control −4.1 (−5.2 to −3.0) <.001 0.92 −2.6 (−3.8 to −1.5) <.001 0.61
Tai chi vs exercise −1.9 (−3.0 to −0.8) .001 0.57 −0.5 (−1.7 to 0.6) .43 0.24
Sleep efficiency in 7-d sleep diary, %
Exercise vs control 3.4 (−0.8 to 7.6) .16 0.25 9.5 (5.1 to 13.9) <.001 0.77
Tai chi vs control 9.0 (4.7 to 13.3) <.001 0.51 10.2 (5.8 to 14.5)d <.001 0.72
Tai chi vs exercise 5.6 (1.4 to 9.8) .02 0.27 0.7 (−3.7 to 5.1) .77 0.05
Wake time after sleep onset in 7-d sleep diary, min
Exercise vs control −12.2 (−26.8 to 2.4) .14 0.17 −23.9 (−39.1 to −8.6) .004 0.43
Tai chi vs control −40.4 (−55.2 to −25.7)d <.001 0.63 −22.5 (−37.5 to −7.5) .006 0.41
Tai chi vs exercise −28.2 (−42.8 to −13.6) <.001 0.46 1.3 (−13.8 to 16.5) .87 0.02
Total sleep time in 7-d sleep diary, min
Exercise vs control 15.8 (−2.5 to 34.1) .13 0.18 44.2 (25.2 to 63.3)d <.001 0.55
Tai chi vs control 49.8 (31.3 to 68.3)d <.001 0.46 36.1 (17.2 to 54.9)d <.001 0.35
Tai chi vs exercise 34.0 (15.6 to 52.3)d <.001 0.28 −8.1 (−27.2 to 10.9) .48 0.2
Hypnotic medication usage recorded in 7-d sleep diary (weekly consumed LRD units)
Exercise vs control −2.1 (−0.6 to −3.7) .02 0.28 −3.3 (−1.7 to −4.9) <.001 0.36
Tai chi vs control −4.0 (−2.5 to −5.5) <.001 0.76 −3.7 (−2.3 to −5.2) <.001 0.73
Tai chi vs exercise −1.9 (−0.2 to −3.6) .05 0.48 −0.5 (−2.2 to 1.2) .86 0.38

Abbreviations: ISI, insomnia severity index; LRD, lowest recommended dosage; PSQI, Pittsburgh sleep quality index.

a

Holm correction was used for post hoc analysis in order to account for the multiplicity within an actigraphy-assessed sleep parameter among difference groups and among the actigraphy-assessed sleep parameters. Closed test procedure with Holm-Bonferroni correction was used for the post hoc analysis of the secondary outcomes.

b

No effect for interaction observed for total sleep time and average awaken time.

c

The pairwise comparison remained statistically significant after Holm correction.

d

The change in magnitude exceeded the clinical significance threshold defined by American Academy of Sleep Medicine (actigraphy tool: 5% in the sleep efficiency, 20 minutes in the wake time after sleep onset, and 2 times in the number of awakenings; subjective tool: 10% in the sleep efficiency, 30 minutes in the wake time after sleep onset, 30 minutes in the total sleep time).18

e

Mean values are averages across 7-day sleep diary. No effect for interaction observed for number of awakenings, sleep onset latency, and average awaken time.