Table 3. Summary of Post Hoc Analysis of Generalized Estimated Equation Analysisa.
| Measurement | Postintervention | Follow-up | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean adjusted change (95% CI) | P value | Effect size | Mean adjusted change (95% CI) | P value | Effect size | |
| Primary outcomes (actigraphy-assessed)b | ||||||
| Sleep efficiency, % | ||||||
| Exercise vs control | 3.5 (1.8 to 5.2) | <.001c | 0.42 | 3.3 (1.4 to 5.2) | <.001c | 0.35 |
| Tai chi vs control | 3.4 (1.6 to 5.1) | <.001c | 0.39 | 6.2 (4.4 to 8.1)d | <.001c | 0.69 |
| Tai chi vs exercise | 0.2 (−1.5 to 1.9) | .85 | 0.03 | 2.9 (1.1 to 4.8) | .002b | 0.35 |
| Wake time after sleep onset, min | ||||||
| Exercise vs control | −17.0 (−24.9 to −9.0) | <.001c | 0.46 | −23.0 (−31.7 to −14.2)d | <.001c | 0.59 |
| Tai chi vs control | −13.3 (−21.3 to −5.2) | .001c | 0.31 | −27.1 (−35.8 to −18.4)d | <.001c | 0.65 |
| Tai chi vs exercise | 3.7 (−4.2 to 11.7) | .36 | 0.15 | −4.1 (−12.6 to 4.4) | .34 | 0.06 |
| No. of awakenings | ||||||
| Exercise vs control | −2.8 (−4.0 to −1.6)d | <.001c | 0.48 | −2.0 (−3.3 to −0.6)d | .004 | 0.44 |
| Tai chi vs control | −2.2 (−3.5 to −1.0) | <.001c | 0.42 | −2.8 (−4.1 to −1.4)d | <.001c | 0.55 |
| Tai chi vs exercise | 0.6 (−0.6 to 1.8)d | .35 | 0.05 | −0.8 (−2.1 to 0.5) | .24 | 0.11 |
| Sleep onset latency, min | ||||||
| Exercise vs control | −0.4 (−2.2 to 1.4) | .68 | 0.0002 | −2.5 (−4.5 to −0.6) | .01 | 0.24 |
| Tai chi vs control | −1.4 (−3.2 to 0.4) | .12 | 0.12 | −3.8 (−5.8 to −1.9) | <.001c | 0.47 |
| Tai chi vs exercise | −1.1 (−2.8 to 0.7) | .24 | 0.12 | −1.3 (−3.2 to 0.6) | .17 | 0.23 |
| Secondary outcomese | ||||||
| PSQI | ||||||
| Exercise vs control | −1.1 (−1.9 to −0.3) | .01 | 0.31 | −0.9 (−1.8 to −0.1) | .03 | 0.29 |
| Tai chi vs control | −2.9 (−3.6 to −2.1) | <.001 | 0.83 | −1.6 (−2.4 to −0.8) | <.001 | 0.49 |
| Tai chi vs exercise | −1.8 (−2.5 to −1.0) | <.001 | 0.52 | −0.6 (−1.4 to 0.2) | .17 | 0.2 |
| ISI | ||||||
| Exercise vs control | −2.2 (−3.3 to −1.0) | <.001 | 0.35 | −2.1 (−3.2 to −0.9) | <.001 | 0.37 |
| Tai chi vs control | −4.1 (−5.2 to −3.0) | <.001 | 0.92 | −2.6 (−3.8 to −1.5) | <.001 | 0.61 |
| Tai chi vs exercise | −1.9 (−3.0 to −0.8) | .001 | 0.57 | −0.5 (−1.7 to 0.6) | .43 | 0.24 |
| Sleep efficiency in 7-d sleep diary, % | ||||||
| Exercise vs control | 3.4 (−0.8 to 7.6) | .16 | 0.25 | 9.5 (5.1 to 13.9) | <.001 | 0.77 |
| Tai chi vs control | 9.0 (4.7 to 13.3) | <.001 | 0.51 | 10.2 (5.8 to 14.5)d | <.001 | 0.72 |
| Tai chi vs exercise | 5.6 (1.4 to 9.8) | .02 | 0.27 | 0.7 (−3.7 to 5.1) | .77 | 0.05 |
| Wake time after sleep onset in 7-d sleep diary, min | ||||||
| Exercise vs control | −12.2 (−26.8 to 2.4) | .14 | 0.17 | −23.9 (−39.1 to −8.6) | .004 | 0.43 |
| Tai chi vs control | −40.4 (−55.2 to −25.7)d | <.001 | 0.63 | −22.5 (−37.5 to −7.5) | .006 | 0.41 |
| Tai chi vs exercise | −28.2 (−42.8 to −13.6) | <.001 | 0.46 | 1.3 (−13.8 to 16.5) | .87 | 0.02 |
| Total sleep time in 7-d sleep diary, min | ||||||
| Exercise vs control | 15.8 (−2.5 to 34.1) | .13 | 0.18 | 44.2 (25.2 to 63.3)d | <.001 | 0.55 |
| Tai chi vs control | 49.8 (31.3 to 68.3)d | <.001 | 0.46 | 36.1 (17.2 to 54.9)d | <.001 | 0.35 |
| Tai chi vs exercise | 34.0 (15.6 to 52.3)d | <.001 | 0.28 | −8.1 (−27.2 to 10.9) | .48 | 0.2 |
| Hypnotic medication usage recorded in 7-d sleep diary (weekly consumed LRD units) | ||||||
| Exercise vs control | −2.1 (−0.6 to −3.7) | .02 | 0.28 | −3.3 (−1.7 to −4.9) | <.001 | 0.36 |
| Tai chi vs control | −4.0 (−2.5 to −5.5) | <.001 | 0.76 | −3.7 (−2.3 to −5.2) | <.001 | 0.73 |
| Tai chi vs exercise | −1.9 (−0.2 to −3.6) | .05 | 0.48 | −0.5 (−2.2 to 1.2) | .86 | 0.38 |
Abbreviations: ISI, insomnia severity index; LRD, lowest recommended dosage; PSQI, Pittsburgh sleep quality index.
Holm correction was used for post hoc analysis in order to account for the multiplicity within an actigraphy-assessed sleep parameter among difference groups and among the actigraphy-assessed sleep parameters. Closed test procedure with Holm-Bonferroni correction was used for the post hoc analysis of the secondary outcomes.
No effect for interaction observed for total sleep time and average awaken time.
The pairwise comparison remained statistically significant after Holm correction.
The change in magnitude exceeded the clinical significance threshold defined by American Academy of Sleep Medicine (actigraphy tool: 5% in the sleep efficiency, 20 minutes in the wake time after sleep onset, and 2 times in the number of awakenings; subjective tool: 10% in the sleep efficiency, 30 minutes in the wake time after sleep onset, 30 minutes in the total sleep time).18
Mean values are averages across 7-day sleep diary. No effect for interaction observed for number of awakenings, sleep onset latency, and average awaken time.