Table 5.
Ablation study results for training MED-Net with different loss functions.
| Dice Coefficient |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cross Entropy | Dice Loss | MSDC+TV | |
| Background | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| Artifact | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.76 |
| Meshwork | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.67 |
| Nest | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.62 |
| Ring | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.79 |
| Aspecific | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.72 |
| Average | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.77 |
| Sensitivity |
|||
| Cross Entropy | Dice Loss | MSDC+TV | |
| Background | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.89 |
| Artifact | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.81 |
| Meshwork | 0.50 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
| Nest | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.50 |
| Ring | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.79 |
| Aspecific | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.77 |
| Average | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 |
| Specificity |
|||
| Cross Entropy | Dice Loss | MSDC+TV | |
| Background | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 |
| Artifact | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.92 |
| Meshwork | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.91 |
| Nest | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Ring | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.94 |
| Aspecific | 0.90 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
| Average | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.94 |