Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: Ecohealth. 2020 Jul 22;17(2):203–216. doi: 10.1007/s10393-020-01486-9

Table 2.

Forward variable selection process for the GWR models. The global component of the four fitted GWR is shown. Differences AIC values and Akaike weights (wi) are shown for each model, in comparison with the best ranking model, both from the global regression (ΔAIC[GR]; wi [GR]) and from the GWR model (ΔAIC[GWR]; wi [GWR]). Global estimated coefficients are presented for all included variables, along with the p values (p; starred p values are significant at 0.05 level). Response variable: residuals from the linear model (detrended_residuals). The first step, considering an intercept-only model, is used as null model.

Variables Estimate p ΔAIC [GR] wi [GR] ΔAIC [GWR] wi [GWR]
Step 1: detrended_residuals ~ 1 35.41 1.60×10−8 162.46 5.28×10−36
Intercept  0.00
Step 2: detrended_residuals ~ pc.frag1 15.09 4.13×10−4 282.37 4.83×10−62
Intercept  0.00
pc.frag1  0.08 *<0.01
Step 3: detrended_residuals ~ pc.frag1 + c.fnp 7.14 0.02 255.74 2.92×10−56
Intercept − 0.06
pc.frag1  0.08 *<0.01
c.fnp  0.01 *<0.01
Step 4: detrended_residuals ~ pc.frag1 + c.fnp + c.fpl 2.75 0.20 228.05 3.02×10−50
Intercept − 0.10
pc.frag1  0.08 *<0.01
c.fnp  0.01 *<0.01
c.fpl  1.92 *0.01
Step 5: detrended_residuals ~ pc.frag1 + c.fnp + c.fpl + temp_jul  0.00 0.78 0.00 1.00
Intercept − 0.62
pc.frag1  0.08 *<0.01
c.fnp  0.01 *<0.01
c.fpl  1.95 *0.01
temp_jul  0.10 *0.03