Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 15;25:62. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03430-3

Table 3.

Effect of iron deficiency treatment (scheduled subgroup analysis)

n Patients with ID treated in hepcidin arm (n = 53) n Patients with ID not treated in control arm (n = 102) p
Primary outcome
Post-ICU LOS (days) 53 42 (16; 90) 102 29 (11; 90) 0.37
Secondary outcomes
Number of days alive at home at day 90 53 50 (0; 76) 102 61 (0; 82) 0.21
Day 15 visit
Day 15 Hb (g/dL) 40 10.7 ± 1.6 59 10.4 ± 1.4 0.24
Day 15 hepcidin (µg/L) 19 35.7 (23.0; 53.7) 31 18.0 (7.6; 44.0) 0.04
Day 30 visit
Fatigue (scale 1–10) 39 5.0 (3.0; 6.0) 61 6.0 (3.0; 7.0) 0.13
MFI-20
 General fatigue (score 9–45) 40 28 (22; 31) 63 26 (18; 30) 0.33
 Mental fatigue (score 6–30) 40 25 (20; 28) 63 25 (20; 28) 0.75
 Reduced activity (score 3–15) 40 8 (6;10) 63 8 (6;11) 0.66
 Reduced motivation (score 2–10) 40 8.(6;10) 63 8 (6; 10) 0.24
Mortality
Death at day 90 53 2 (3.8) 102 17 (16.7) 0.02

Data are expressed as mean ± SD, median(Q1;Q3) or n(%). We compared the outcomes of patient with iron deficiency (ID, defined as an hepcidin concentration < 41 µg/L) treated in the hepcidin arm to the patients with ID not treated in the control arm

Italics were used to indicate sub-headings in the tables and p-values

ICU intensive care unit, LOS length of stay, MFI-20 multidimensional fatigue inventory, Hb hemoglobin

* Absolute risk difference